Trends in International Business
(last modified 8/19/98 )
Introduction
The most significant transformation the world economy has experienced during
the second half of this century has been the internationalization of business.
The global restructuring of industries and work has been particularly pronounced
within the last 25 years, as evidenced by the rapid growth in the volume
of international business activities, worldwide and in the US. International
business activity is predicted to increase at an even faster rate in the
future.
The business world of tomarrow will be quite different from that of
the past. Firms will purchase raw materials, parts and other inputs
in different countries, assemble them in another country, and then sell
them in yet other countries around the world. For ex., Nike designs
their products in the US, builds prototypes in Taiwan, manufactures them
in 40 locations around Asia, and sells them around the world. All
firms will face competition from products and services that come from abroad.
Products, services, managers and employees will all participate in a global
business community.
The purpose of this Web page is to describe trends in international
business, first world wide and then for the US. For both of these
trends, changes in the amount of international business activity that have
taken place in the past, predicted future international business activity,
and the explanations for these changes are presented.
Within the context of the Gannon IB program Web site, of which this
page is a part, and for students who may be in the process of selecting
a career, this page is intended to explain why there will be increased
job and career opportunities in the international area in the future, which
are described on the Web page entitled "Job Opportunities
in International Business". Students interested in such a career
may wish to consider the Gannon IB program, which was initiated in Fall,
1995, to meet the growing need for properly trained individuals, and is
described on that part of Web page entitled "Gannon
International Business Program".
Outline
This Web page consists of the following parts:
Summary
The most important conclusions of this report as related to job opportunities
in the international area, which are described on the Web page entitled
"Job Opportunities in International Business,"
are as follows:
-
World wide international business activities have increased rapidly over
the past 25 years and are expected to continue increasing in the future.
-
Over the last ten years, international business activities in the US have
increased, and are expected to increase at an even faster rate in the future,
and more than in other countries, as a result of the following two factors:
-
increased opportunities overseas, due mainly to a global growth wave that
is unprecedented in size and scope and is being referred to as the third
golden age of growth and
-
the competitive advantages of US firms.
-
In the opinion of Joseph P. Quinlan, senior international economist for
Dean Witter, the US is on the "cusp of a golden age in exports."
-
In the US, more small and medium sized firms are starting to export, the
number that export is predicted to increase in the future, and those that
export are exporting more, but there are tens of thousands of small and
medium sized businesses that are capable of exporting but are not.
References
Much of the information contained in this report was obtained from the
following sources:
-
Arpan, Jeffrey S. Opportunities in International Business Careers.
VGM Career Horizons, Chicago, 1995. [page references are indicated in brackets]
-
Various Wall Street Journal (WSJ) articles, with dates indicated in brackets
-
Czinkota, Michael, R., Ilkka A. Ronkainen, and Michael H. Moffett.
International Business. Fifth Edition. Philadelphia:
The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999. (Hereafter
referred to as CRM)
-
Other references are indicated in brackets
International business
defined
Before trends in international business can be presented and analyzed it
is important to understand exactly what is being measured. International
business consists of transactions and activities that occur between people
or organizations from different countries. These transactions take
on various forms. There are two major categories of international
business activities: international trade and international investment.
The first category, international trade, involves the buying and selling
of a product, which could be either a good or a service, or the renting
of an asset, across a border. A good is a tangible commodity, i.e.,
capable of being touched, such as a raw material, e.g.., coal, tin, copper,
rubber, oil; agricultural product, e.g., wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton;
semifinished goods, i.e., intermediate products, used in the production
of other goods, e.g., computer chips, chemicals, seats and engines for
automobiles, and fabrics for clothes; or finished products, e.g., transportation
vehicles, computers, video recorders, TVs, shoes, and foods and beverages.
Services refer to intangible commodities, such as transportation, education,
management, and financial services. A licensing arrangement
would be an example of the renting of an asset, such as a copyright, patent,
or trademark.
The second category of international business activity, international
investment, refers to the buying or selling of an asset, i.e., transfer,
of assets across a national border. There are two subcategories:
foreign direct investment, and foreign portfolio invesment, which correspond
to the transfer of real or financial assets, respectively. Foreign
direct investment (FDI) is the creation, or establishment, of a production
facility overseas. FDI includes such activities as building a manufacturing
facility, buying land, commercial property or a farm in a foreign country
and purchasing or acquiring an existing foreign firm. FDI may involve
forming a joint venture (JV) with a domestic firm. Foreign
portfolio investment refers to buying less than 10% of the stock of a foreign
company or purchasing debt instruments, such as bonds, bills, or notes,
issued by a foreign company or government. The purchase of a debt
instrument is equivalent to making a loan to another party.
World
wide International Business Activity Trends
In this first part of the document changes in the amount of international
business activity worldwide are presented. Some explanations for
these trends are then presented.
Growth
of international business activity world wide statistics
World wide international business activities have increased rapidly over
the past 25 years as indicated by the following statistics:
-
the volume of international trade, including both merchandise and services,
expanded from $200 billion to $6.3 trillion [World Trade Organization,
Dec 1997], which was twice the growth in total world output, and
-
foreign direct investment (FDI) grew fifteenfold from $211 billion to more
than $3.2 trillion (in 1997) [UN Conference on Trade and Development, "World
Investment Report," August, 1997].
-
The 1993 cumulative FDI consisted of 207,000 foreign affiliates, i.e.,
subsidiaries, of 38,000 parent firms. The affiliates had sales of
$5.8 trillion in 1992, which was $1.1 trillion more than world wide exports.
Some other statistics related to the growth of international business activity
worldwide are the following:
-
World trade has increased from $7 trillion at the start of the decade to
$11 trillion today, significantly outstripping the growth in world wide
merchandise production. [Barron’s, Jan. 20, 1997]
-
Between 1985 and 1996, using preliminary statistics, DRI/McGraw Hill estimated
that worldwide exports increased 94.2% [WSJ 6/13/96]
-
New world wide FDI was $325 billion in 1995, up 46% from 1994. [WSJ 6/13/96]
International business activity is expected to continue increasing in the
future. International trade will continue to increase in both volume
and value in the future. It can be expected that additional products
will be traded internationally, additional countries will become actively
involved in international trade, more industries and companies will be
involved in more locations in each country. [Arpan, p. 30]
The future trends for foreign direct and portfolio investment also look
promising. [Arpan, p. 33]
Changes
in world wide factors contributing to growth of international business
activity
The explanations for the increased international business activity worldwide
described in the previous section can be divided into the following two
categories:
-
broad changes in the world that have created the potential to increase
international business activity
-
factors explaining why more firms are finding it advantegous to go global
and take advantage of the opportunities created to increase measured international
business
The reasons why it is increasingly advantageous for firms to participate
in international business are considered in the next section. The
purpose of this section of the document is to explain the broad overall
changes in the world that have created the potential for increased international
business activities. Some of the factors explaining the past growth
and predicted future growth in international business activity worldwide,
each of which is explained in detail below, are as follows:
-
Rapid increase in and expansion of communication and transportation technology
-
Reduction of government restrictions regarding cross-border movement of
trade and resources
-
Development of the institutions needed to support and facilitate international
trade
-
Increased global competition
Rapid increase in and expansion of communication and transportation technologies
In the last couple of decades, there have been tremendous advances in communications
and transportation technology, including commercial transatlantic supersonic
air travel, faxing, email via the Internet, overseas direct dial telephone
service, cellular and digital telephone service, and satellite TV.
One effect of these improvements in technology is that more people around
the world are aware of the goods and services that are available in other
countries, and this knowledge is more quickly available. This knowledge
increases the demand for products produced in other countries, which in
turn increases the amount of international business activity.
Since conducting a multinational business usually involves greater distances
than in domestic business, and greater distances increase operating costs
and make control of a multinational company’s foreign operations more difficult,
these technological advances also improve communications, speed up interactions,
and increase managers’ ability to control foreign operations. The
resultant reduction in the costs of managing integrated production world
wide encourages foreign direct investment.. [WSJ 3/15/95]
Technological improvements also reduce the transaction costs involved
in many forms of international business activity and thus increases the
quantity of such activities.
Reduction of government restrictions regarding cross-border movement of
trade and resources
Every country restricts the movement across its borders of goods, services
and resources, such as capital and labor, and attempts to make its products
relatively more competitive, using such trade instruments as tariffs, quotas,
subsidies, and other non tariff barriers. Government intervention
of this nature reduces the volume of international trade and investment.
Thus, reductions in such restrictions increases trade.
Generally, governments today impose fewer restrictions on cross border
movements than they did a decade or two ago. Many governments have
unilaterally lowered restrictions for the following reasons:
-
Citizens have expressed the desire for better access to a greater variety
of goods and services at lower prices.
-
To encourage domestic producers to become more efficient by confronting
them with increased foreign competition.
-
They hope to induce other countries to reduce their trade barriers.
The greatest reduction in trade restrictions, however, has resulted from
increased economic integration, i.e., the formation of regional trading
blocs, such as NAFTA, MERCOSUR, and the EU, as well as from international
trade agreements such as those created by GATT/WTO.
Development of the institutions needed to support and facilitate international
trade
Today, most producers can be paid relatively easily for goods and services
sold abroad due to a host of innovations, including the following:
-
money in place of barter,
-
the existence of foreign exchange markets that enable the conversion of
one country’s currency into that of another,
-
insurance to cover damage en route and nonpayment by the buyer,
-
postal services, and
-
financial instruments issued by banks that reduce the risk of not being
paid.
These institutional arrangements reduce the risk of default on the part
of the other party involved in a trade transaction and thus increase
the volume of trade.
Increased global competition
Today it would be difficult to find a company, large or small, that is
not affected by global events and competition because most companies sell
output to and/or secure supplies from foreign countries and/or compete
against products and services that come from abroad. Even the domestic
firm that does not want to become involved in international business is
affected by international events since it still has to compete with imported
substitutes for its product in the domestic market. The pressures
of increased competition can persuade a company to expand its own business
into international markets. Firms, particularly those that hitherto
operated only domestically and confronted with just domestic competition,
are now facing increased competition from foreign firms, as well as from
other domestic firms that operate internationally, which may have resulted
in a decrease in their domestic market share, and necessitating one or
both of the following changes:
-
seeking out new markets overseas in order to increase sales and profits,
which may result in the firm becoming involved in exporting, FDI,
and/or licensing,
-
lowering costs, which a firm may do by sourcing globally for inputs, which
increases imports, or by locating production facilities abroad.
As more and more companies set up manufacturing operations abroad, other
firms may also do so as well to prevent competitors from capturing the
foreign market with a head start. [WSJ 3/15/95]
Advantages
of Going International to Businesses
The changes in the world environment described in the previous section
have made possible investment strategies and business opportunities that
offer tremendous opportunities. But, in order for these technological,
government and institutional developments to produce measured increases
in international business activities, firms must take advantage of the
opportunities created. Thus, the second reason that international
business activity has increased and will continue to increase in the future
is that it is increasingly advantageous for firms to participate in international
business. Individual firms and entire industries are coming to recognize
that in today’s trade environment, isolation is no longer possible.
There is not a big company today that doesn’t talk about being global.
[WSJ 4/21/95]
The purpose of this section of the document is to explain why firms
are increasing going global. As there are different reasons that
particular firms engage in the various types of international business
activities, it is difficult to generalize the advantages or importance
of going international to businesses. However, considered from
the perspecitve of a firm selling a manufactured product, say, some of
the advantages, benefits, or importance of being involved globally to business
firms, each of which is explained in detail below, are as follows:
Greater potential to expand
sales
The desire to increase sales is a major motive for a company’s expansion
into international business. A company could increases sales through
increased exporting or FDI. Ordinarily, higher sales mean higher
revenues and higher profits. Exports account for 20% of the profits
of American corporations. A firm could attempt to increase
sales domestically, but foreign markets offer greater opportunities.
From the perspective of US businesses there is a greater potential to increase
sales outside the US than within for the following four specific reasons,
each of which is explained in more detail below:
-
there is a larger population and more purchasing power outside the U.S.
-
changes in international politics are opening up more foreign markets
-
the rate of growth in output and various measures of income received by
the households in many foreign countries is greater than for the US
-
for many products the US market has become saturated
The numbers thing
The first reason that there is greater potential to increase sales by going
international is just a number’s thing - the fact that 90% of the world’s
population is outside the U.S., and 60% of the world’s purchasing power
is outside the U.S.
Changes in international politics
The second reason that there is greater potential to increase sales by
going international is that changes in international politics are opening
up more markets. As a result of the demise of communism around the
world, many more markets are now accessible to US firms, including those
in the following countries: the former USSR; eastern European countries
that were formerly part of the Soviet bloc, i.e., Soviet satellite countries,
including East Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary,
Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, and the former Yugoslavia; China; and India.
Many South America countries, such as Brazil, Argentina, and Chile, have
opened up as the result of the overthrow of military juntas or dictatorships.
Even in countries that weren’t previously communistic, there has been a
demise in socialist ideas, and an adoption of more free market economic
policies. [WSJ 1/20/97]
For companies that are prepared to go international, the above mentioned
countries offer potential, new markets and tremendous opportunities that
were not there just 10 years ago. "With the fall of communism and
the ebbing of Third World protectionism, the global market for US
products has tripled in the past decade.." [WSJ 3/29/95] Thus,
not only are there more people outside the US, but more of those people
are now available to sell product to.
The following are some specific examples of the future opportunities
in different parts of the world:
-
Over the next five years Asia alone is expected to spend $1 trillion on
telecommunications, construction and other infrastructure projects, such
as roads, subways, airports, high rise offices and apartments, hospitals,
schools, and advanced telecom systems, providing enormous opportunity for
US manufacturers, consultants, and salespeople. [Barron’s, Jan 20,
1997]
-
China alone will need $744 billion for telecommunications, power, transportation,
and sanitation in next decade [WSJ 11/29/95].
-
Energy executives estimate India will need $140 billion in power investment
over the next 15 yrs to overcome its energy shortage [WSJ 9/9/96].
Latin America could account for another $500 billion. The demands
for consumer goods, entertainment and health care are off the charts.
[WSJ 12/14/95]
-
Asia and Latin America are regarded as two of the hottest growth markets
in the world for auto sales. [WSJ, 1994]
Higher growth rates in other countries
A third reason that there is greater potential for increasing sales overseas
is that the predicted future rates of growth in output, as measured
by GDP, and various measures of income received by the households for foreign
countries, is greater than for the US. Income is one of the most
important factors affecting the demand for a particular product.
As other countries develop economically, and output and various measures
of income increase, there will be an increase in the number of households
in the middle class which will increase the demand for many products, especially
consumer products.
The rates of growth for many foreign countries, particularly the developing
countries, has been and will continue to be greater than that for the US,
as demonstrated by the following statistics:
-
The rate of GDP growth for China has averaged 10%/year over the last decade,
in comparison with a 2.4% growth rate for the US over the past 20 years.
[WSJ 3/29/95]
-
China is predicted to have the largest economy in the world in 20 years.
[WSJ 4/21/95]
-
Between 1995 and 2000, India is expected to have an annual growth rate
of 6% and China 7.8% [WSJ 1/12/95]. Analysts are not predicting a
growth rate above 2.5%/year for the US for the foreseeable future.
Saturated domestic markets
The fourth reason that foreign markets offer a greater potential to increase
sales is that, for many products, the US market has become saturated.
For many products, such as fast foods, soda, cosmetics, automobiles, and
PCs there is not as much potential for sales growth in the US as in foreign
markets.
Acquire resources
The second reason that it has become important for a firm to be involved
internationally is to acquire resources or inputs. While a distributor
may seek out a finished product produced in a foreign country in order
to resell in the domestic market, or a company may actively seek to import
new foreign finished products to complement its existing lines, manufacturers
seek out parts, services, components and other intermediate products produced
in foreign countries for the following reasons:
-
A company may import an intermediate product from abroad because it is
not readily available within the company’s home country. For example,
soon after the development of notebook computers in the early 1990’s, US
manufacturers imported the LCD screens from Japan, since there were no
US commercial manufacturers, particularly of the active matrix screens.
-
A firm may import some intermediate product to use in its production facilities
because it is cheaper or of better quality than what is available domestically.
If international procurement of supplies and components lowers the costs
or improves the quality of the finished product, the importer may then
be better able to combat its competition for the finished product and thereby
increase profits. World class exporters need access to world class
suppliers.
-
In addition to intermediate products, firms also look for foreign sources
of financial capital, physical or "real" capital, and technology that they
can use at home. For example when Gillette Co. set up a Boston factory
to make sensor blades it turned to Britain for laser welding technology
and to Germany for precision machine tools. [WSJ 3/29/95]
Diversify
sources of sales and supplies in order to spread risk
The third reason that international business is important to businesses
is that it enables them to increase the number of markets for their product
and sources of supply of inputs, i.e., intermediate products. The
result is a reduction of wild swings in sales and prices and availability
of inputs, i.e., reduced risk. In the following, the effect on sales
is considered first and then the effect on sourcing.
Diversify sales
Manufacturing firms prefer to maintain a constant rate of output as large
variations in the level of production result in big changes in the
amount of inputs used. By spreading sales over many markets, a producer
may be able to minimize fluctuations in the total demand for its product
and hence production rates. The more customers a firm has the less
vulnerable it would be to the loss of a single customer or a few.
In addition, globalization enables a manufacturer to smooth out sales for
the following two reasons:
-
The same product might be in a different stage of its life cycle in different
countries.
-
Different countries may be in different phases of the business cycle, which
is the reoccurring pattern of expansion and contraction in economic activity.
As sales decrease in one country that is in a recession, they may increase
in another that is in the expansionary phase of the business cycle.
Many international companies take advantage of the fact that the timing
of business cycles differs among countries as demonstrated by the following
examples:
-
The 1/15/96 WSJ reported that the heavy duty truck manufacturers were bracing
for a bumpy sales year in 1996. Mack Trucks, which is based in Allentown,
PA, and is a subsidary of Renault of France, was predicting a 25% sales
decline in 1996 from 1995 in the US due to the expectation that the US
economy would be weak. Thus, in early 1996, it considered building
new assembly plants in Mexico and South America to make the manufacturer
less susceptible to swings in the US economy. [WSJ 1/12/96]
Since heavy trucks is a highly cyclical industry, which means that sales
will follow the ups and downs of the business cycle, it is especially important
for the manufacturer to operate in countries which hopefully are in different
phases of the business cycle.
-
HP, despite a 50% drop in Mexico sales, because of the late 1994 peso collapse,
posted double digit sales gains for all of Latin America for the fiscal
year ending Oct. 31, 1995, as a result of banner performances in
Chile, Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela.
-
US PC manufacturers are attempting to increase sales of PCs to both Europe
and Asia in order to lessen their reliance on the US where consumer demand
would decrease in the event of a recession [WSJ 9/15/95].
Diversify sources of inputs
Consider now the advantage to a firm of having alternative sources of supply
of inputs. The larger the number of alternative suppliers of various
inputs used, the less vulnerable the company is to price increases or shortages
on the part of any single supplier. By obtaining supplies of the
same product from different countries, a company is able to reduce its
risks, as illustrated by the following examples:
-
Many large US steel customers, such as the automobile industry, have diversified
their steel purchases to include European and Japanese suppliers.
This strategy has reduced the risk of supply shortages for the US auto
industry in case of a strike among steelworkers in the US and provides
an alternative in the event of domestic steel price increases. Before
giving into demands for higher prices from domestic steel makers, General
Motors pursued every alternative. It traveled the world - Europe,
Japan, Korea, and Brazil - in a bid to find cheaper steel.
-
Japan, which imports 100% of its oil, is currently negotiating to obtain
oil from Vietnam and the South China Sea in order to reduce its dependence
on unreliable Mid East oil.
-
Honda considered buying Korean steel for its Japanese assembly plants.
[WSJ 8/5/94] It is the first time that it considered buying non-Japanese
steel.
Hone competitive skills
The fourth advantage of going international is that it enables a firm to
increase its competitive skills. By going abroad, firms can challenge
their competitors on their own ground, learn from them and hopefully translate
the absorbed knowledge into productivity improvements back home.
If nothing else, at least they become aware regarding what is happening
in foreign markets. Firms that only operate in a domestic market
are at risk of being surprised by the entry of foreign competition and
seeing their domestic market share threatened. More and more companies
are becoming aware that the only way to expand and remain competitive is
to enter the international marketplace.
Economies of scale
The fifth advantage of going international is to take advantage of economies
of scale. Economies of scale are various factors that enable a firm
to decrease average costs of production as output increases during what
is referred to as the long run length of time, which is a period of time
during which a firm can change the amount of all resources used, which
in the case of a manufacturing firm, includes the size of the plant.
Studies have shown that a company can generally reduce its costs/unit by
20-30% each time output is doubled.
The increase in sales that results through, say, exporting, can help
firms achieve economies of scale that cannot be attained by operating only
in domestic markets. The resultant cost reduction enables the firm
to gain an advantage over its competitors, not just at home but abroad
as well. Its profits/unit increase. The firm becomes more competitive.
A good example of a product subject to economies of scale over a wide
range of output is automobile production. As output increases the
manufacturer can take advantage of assembly lines, robots, body stamping
equipment, multiple boring of engine block machinery, and other large,
expensive equipment, all of which produce a decrease in costs/unit of production.
The following are two specific examples related to auto production:
-
Although car exports to the US only bring Daimler Benz marginal income
on the sale of Mercedes, the increase in total output that those sales
produce allows the company to improve factory utilization rates in Germany,
lower costs/unit, and increase profit on each unit sold in Europe, making
Mercedes as a whole more profitable. [WSJ 4/27/95].
-
Consider now the case of Volvo. If Volvo just sold cars domestically
in Sweden, sales would be low, its average costs would be quite high, and
it would not be competitive with global manufacturers. Thus, it exports
to Europe and North America in order to reduce average costs. The
1/10/96 and 1/11/96 WSJ reported that due to the high cost of developing
new cars, it believes that it has to get even bigger in the car business
or get bought by another auto company. Becoming larger, i.e., increasing
output, would allow it to spread those fixed costs over a larger level
of output and decrease average costs. It is thus considering building
vehicles in North America, either through a joint venture with the likes
of Mitsubishi or through its own assembly plant.
Greater profitability
The sixth, and last, reason global business is important to businesses
is that a producer might be able to sell the same product at a greater
profit abroad than at home. On reason for this may be that as a
result of less competition in the foreign market, possibly because
the product is in a different stage of its life cycle there, companies
are able to charge premium prices for their product. Even many small
manfacturers are seeing higher profits as a result of their sales to foreign
markets. [WSJ 9/20/96] Another reason is because of different
government policies at home and abroad that affect profitability, e.g.,
differences in the taxation of earnings or in regulation of prices.
For example, McDonald’s profits are greater overseas. Although US
sales were higher than overseas sales by $2 billion in 1995, McDonalds
international operation pre tax profits were higher than its domestic profits
[WSJ 1/26/96].
Conclusions
In sum, the above discussed factors explain why more firms find it advanteous
to go international, which alone would increase international business
activity. But, when coupled with the greater opportunities
created by the changes in the world wide factors discussed in previous
section, the effect is even greater. The following examples demonstrate
the importance of going international to US firms:
-
Coke - 80% of earning from overseas
-
UTC - 50% of revenues from overseas
-
Cargill - 50% of revenues from overseas
-
Digital Equipment - around 50% of its sales from Europe. [WSJ 7/10/95]
-
Time Warner - overseas revenue from music and film productions is larger
than domestic revenue. [WSJ 8/2/95]
-
Eastman Kodak Co. - 40% of earnings from abroad; [WSJ 11/22/95]
-
MMM - 50% of earnings from abroad [WSJ 11/22/95]
-
MS - 59% of its revenues overseas [WSJ 12/18/95]
-
HP - about 60% of its revenue from overseas. [WSJ 12/13/96]
-
Tupperware - 85% of revenue and 96% of profits in 1995 from overseas [WSJ
11/29/96]
-
Intel - 58% of sales from overseas [WSJ 1/97]
-
GE - 40% of revenues from overseas in 1996, and is estimated to increase
to 50% by 2000. [WSJ 1/13/97]
US
international business activity trends
In the previous part of this document, worldwide international business
trends were considered. In this part, the focus is on US international
business trends. First, some statistics related to changes in the
amount international business activity in the past are presented.
Next, future predictions are presented. Some explanations for these
trends are then provided. This part concludes by analyzing participation
in international business by small and medium sized businesses. This
part of the document consists of the following sections:
Rise
and Fall of the US in importance in international business, WWII to 1987
The US dominated international business activity from the 1950s through
the early 1970s, despite a general increase in such activity by many other
countries. [Arpan, p. 27] By the end of the 1960s, the
US had become the dominant economic power in the world, and, in terms of
volume and value, was the world’s largest international trader and investor.
American companies had established production, sales, and service facilities
in virtually every country of the world. [Arpan, p. 21] The
US had become the world's largest investor and lender, had a significant
lead, if not monopoly, in most technologies, the widest range of products
to sell, and the world’s largest companies and most productive labor force.
Then, bit by bit, this dominance began to erode, beginning in 1973.
While international business activity by US firms continued to increase
in dollar and volume amounts, the importance and international competitiveness
of the US relative to other nations declined. For example, in the
early 1950’s the US accounted for nearly 25% of world exports; by 1991,
this figure declined to 12%. Significant competition for US firms
in both their domestic and foreign markets began to emerge. The US
was no longer neither the leader in technology nor the lowest cost producer
in many areas. The rankings of US companies among the world’s largest
companies declined. In several industries, foreign companies became
the largest in the world. US trade surpluses turned into huge trade
deficits, and the US changed from being the world’s biggest creditor to
its biggest debtor nation. [Arpan, p. 28] In 1985, many bemoaned
the decline of American industry, especially its technology sector.
Some of the factors that contributed to the decline in the relative
trade position of the US from the early 1970s until the late 1980s include
the following:
-
The US domestic market was not only large but growing rapidly enough after
WWII to provide ample business opportunities so that many US firms did
not feel a compelling need to seek business beyond the national borders.
Subsequently, the perception emerged that doing business abroad was too
risky, complicated and therefore not worth it. The US private sector
became unwilling to participate in and fearful of international business.
For example, after being burned with overseas equity stakes in the 1950s
and early 1960s, US steel producers developed a reputation for fearing
to venture abroad. They traditionally viewed the world outside the
US only as a source of raw materials and not as a market. [WSJ 8/26/97]
-
Many firms that were not monitoring what was happening internationally
were surprised by foreign competitors resulting in a loss of domestic market
share.
-
US policy makers believed that the US private sector did not need any help
in its international business efforts.
-
Some of the decline in the importance of the US in international trade
represents a return to a more normal state. After WWII there was
little foreign competition for many large US MNCs. As other countries
in Europe and Japan gradually reestablished themselves following the war
and increased their industrial capacity, output and exports, it was somewhat
natural that the importance of the US in international business declined.
Rise
of the importance of the US in international business in 1990s
A reversal of the decline of the US in international activities began in
1987, as evidenced by the following statistics:
-
US exports have increased tremendously since 1987. In 1996,
exports were 12% of GDP, compared with 7% in 1985, indicating the growing
importance of trade to this country. [Barron’s, Jan 20, 1997]
-
Between 1992 and 1996, US exports increased 34%.
-
Exports of US manufactured goods totaled $452 billion in 1995, up 52% from
$298 billion in 1990. [WSJ 12/20/96]
-
Fueled by a string of successes, US multinationals’ plunge into foreign
investment has reached the highest level in history. World wide FDI
was $325 billion in 1995. American companies accounted for the biggest
chunk of that investment, pouring a record $95 billion into overseas affiliates.
That was three times the amount in 1990. [WSJ 6/13/96]
-
Another indication of the nation’s trade might is the continuing surge
in the nation’s exports of sophisticated capital goods from aircraft and
computers to medical and construction equipment. In 1996, capital
goods accounted for 40% of the nation’s merchandise exports. The
fastest growing segment for capital goods exports is advanced technology
goods, such as computers, chips and telecom products. These exports
increased 40% since 1993. The US now reigns supreme as supplier of
the Information Age’s silicon brains and sinews. And this may only
be a beginning. The US accounts for 1/5 of world information / technology
products.
-
America seems to be on a roll. US steel and auto producers regained significant
ground as have other producers of big ticket items.
Predicted
future increase in US international activity
International business activity by US firms, both in absolute amounts and
relative to other countries, is predicted to increase at an even greater
rate in the future as evidenced by the following statistics:
-
Jeffrey Garten, Undersecretary of Commerce, has stated that the US has
become "an export powerhouse," and that the department projects that
US exports could soar to $1.2 trillion by the year 2000, with 15.7 million
US jobs supported by overseas sales. [WSJ 8/18/95] Since US exports
for 1996 were $835.55 billion, this prediction corresponds to an increase
of 43.6%.
-
In 1985, 12% of American economic activity as measured by GDP was linked
to exports plus imports. In 1995 it was 23%. By 2005 it could
be 30%. [December 14, 1995, Wall Street Journal]
-
By the end of the decade, 16 million people will be employed in the
export sector, double the number in 1990 if current trends continue.
Explanation
for recent and predicted increase in US international business activity
The increase over the past ten years and the predicted future increase
in international business activity by US firms is the result of the following
two factors, each of which is explained in detail below.
Increased overseas opportunities
The first factor explaining the recent and predicted future increase in
international business opportunities for US firms is increased opportunities
overseas. As output and various measures of income received by households
increase in other countries demand for US products increase and US exports
as well as other types of international business activities increase.
In the recent past as well as for the future, the growth of output, as
measured by GDP, is greater for other countries than for the US, as demonstrated
with the following statistics:
-
For the 20 years through 1993, the world’s economies averaged annual rises
of 2% in GDP. Growth jumped to 3.7% in 1994, and has stayed in that
range and should top 4% in 1997. [WSJ 3/13/97]
-
WEFA predicts world growth for the coming 20 years to average 4%.
-
As reported in the 9/17/97 WSJ the global economy is about to enjoy what
could be its best five year stretch in the past 25 years. The IMF
forecasts global growth rate of about 4.5% / year over the next five years,
compared with an average of 3.75% over the past quarter century.
-
The 9/17/97 WSJ reported that the IMF is predicting growth between 5% and
6% in the developing world for decades to come.
-
By the year 2015, China may be the world’s largest economy, with a GDP
of $11-12 trillion, up from $5 trillion in 1997. In 2015, the five
principal Asian countries will account for more than 42% of the global
product. [WSJ 3/20/97]. China will be producing a quarter of
the global product in 2015.
It is being suggested that this future period of increased growth may rival
two earlier periods of
high rates of world growth. The first was the 40 year stretch
before WWI, when mass production began, industries consolidated, and US
firms took their operations abroad. The second golden age was from
1950 to 1973 during which world growth averaged 4.9%/year, partly stemming
from innovations that had been bottled up by the Depression and WWII.
This future period of increased growth is being referred to as the third
golden age of growth.
The factors explaining the recent and predicted increased world growth
are the following:
-
The move to freer markets in countries where state control stifled commerce
in the past. Most of the world’s governments are now convinced that
economic liberalization is the surest path to growth. Governments
all over the world are moving in the same direction - deregulating, privatizing,
cutting their deficits, and vying for foreign investment. Studies have
indicated that the smaller the role of the government in the economy the
higher the rate of growth.
-
Leapfrog effect. Developing countries aren’t saddled with old equipment.
They can use the latest and best equipment, which is usually much cheaper.
In prior eras, the developing countries received older technologies, if
they got anything at all. Increase in capital and technological improvements
increase the growth rate.
-
Increased capital. FDI from developed to developing countries tripled
between 1990 to 1995, to $112 billion. Total invesment to developing
countries increased 30% annually this decade to $231 billion in 1996.
Increases in capital, which is a resource, increases GDP.
Advantages of US firms
This global growth wave that is unprecedented in size and scope will, in
turn open up a new frontier for industrialized countries and represent
an untapped bonanza. US firms are well prepared to capitalize on these
opportunities, which increases international business activity, as a result
of following advantages:
-
As a result of the reengineering and slimming of bloated payrolls in the
1980s, American companies have reduced costs, and they are continuing to
reduce costs. For example, US unit labor costs are half of Germany’s
and substantially lower than Japan’s. US compensation costs, which
include salary plus benefits, for production workers average $17.28/hour;
compared with $23.66 in Japan, and $31.88 in Germany. Some
ten European nations have higher hourly compensation does the US.
[Barron’s, Jan 20, 1997]
-
According to the Swiss World Economic Forum, which ranks countries according
to their growth prospects for the next five to ten years, the US was ranked
as having the most competitive economy in the world in 1994 and 1995 [9/6/95
WSJ] and forth in 1996 [WSJ 9/3/96].
-
US firms are now producing solid, innovative products desired by the rest
of the world.
-
The rest of the world believes that the US has the best quality products
at the best prices.
-
The US produces more of the goods which are growing in demand as incomes
rise in developing nations.
-
Today the US is the world leader in technology, particularly in biotechnology,
environmental technology, and computer and communications technology [WSJ
9/19/94], as well as the world leader in other industries, such as entertainment.
-
American MNCs are the most thoroughly globalized companies in the world.
They produce about twice as much at their subsidiaries outside their borders
as European and Japanese MNCs. [WSJ 11/29/95]
Implications for
US international business activity
As a result of the increased opportunities overseas and the advantages
of US firms, US international business activity is predicted to increase
in the future. One person who is especially bullish on America is
Joseph P. Quinlan, senior international economist for Dean Witter.
In his opinion, the US is on the "cusp of a golden age in exports, one
that promises to fuel domestic employment and income and fatten corporate
profits." Quinlan believes the best is yet to come, particularly
because the US is now in its best competitive position in years.
In his view, it is the dawn of a golden age for US exporters and MNCs.
[Barron’s, Jan 20, 1997]
In light of all time high stock prices in 1995 and 1996, Wall Street
seems convinced of this potential for US firms. [WSJ 4/18/95]
The increased stock prices are a reflection of predicted future increased
earnings due to increased international business activities as much of
the earnings of US based companies is from abroad. A 1/13/97 WSJ
article indicated that the companies contributing the most to the 20.3%
rise in S&P in 1996 were MNCs that do a lot of exporting. A 1/97
WSJ article noted that in Morgan Stanley’s list of companies with a global
competitive edge that could help their stock performance, 22 of the 40
winners were American.
Increased
Participation in International Business by Small and Medium Sized Firms
Most large multinational corporations (MNCs) have been involved in international
business for some time and account for most of the international trade
and investment activity described and explained in the previous sections
of this part of the document. The 50 largest US exporters account
for 30% of the nation's merchandise exports. An interesting aspect
of the globalization of business is that it is not only large multinational
corporations that have sought to become involved. There has also
been increased participation by small and medium sized firms (s&ms).
S&ms are beginning to feel competition from less deveoped countries
and realize that they can no longer afford to ignore the international
market and are becoming involved. Many smaller companies now depend
on foreign sales. As is the case with the large MNCs, due to the
saturated domestic market, the opportunities for midsize manufacturers
to increase sales are in new, overseas markets. They understand that
they better get into the game or its going to be too late. Not only are
the s&ms involved in exporting, but also FDI, since technological developments
in communications, transportation, and financial services have made it
easier to manage foreign operations.
Small companies do have some advantages in international business, including
the following [WSJ 12/20/96]:
-
They can fly in under the radar without being noticed and make a quiet
splash.
-
They can offer foreigners more personal contact with the chief executive.
-
The declining cost of technology has helped level the playing field for
small companies.
Worldwide 30% of small and medium sized firms export. While there
are various definitions, s&ms in the US could be considered to be firms
with fewer than 500 employees and annual sales of less than $250 million.
Fewer than 7,000 of the 20.1 million businesses in the US are considered
to be large. In the US, firms with as few as 16 employees have successful
international operations. [WSJ 12/20/96]
The importance of US s&ms in export activity is revealed
by the following statistics:
-
According to the Commerce Dept., small companies, defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as one with fewer than 250 employees, now
account for about 96% of US exporters, but generate only about 30% of the
export volume. [WSJ 3/5/96]
-
In the US there are 150,000 companies classified as small, i.e., having
less than 400 employees and total annual sales of less $70 million.
These small companies account for over 20% of U.S. manufacturing exports.
[D&R, p. 10]
-
In 1996, 8,000 companies were expected to expand their exports with the
help of the Commerce Dept., more than twice the number in 1993.
The purpose of the remainder of this section of the document is to provide
the details of some recent surveys regarding the involvement of s&ms
in international business, the conclusions of which are as follows:
-
more s&ms are starting to export,
-
the number of s&ms that export is predicted to increase in the future,
-
those s&ms that export are growing faster than those that don’t,
-
those s&ms that export are exporting more,
-
those s&ms with a strong commitment to exporting have doubled in number
in the last two years, and
-
those s&ms with a strong commitment to exporting are increasing exports
more.
-
in future there will be increased participation by s&ms, particularly
in the US
The detailed results of several surveys of s&ms are presented below.
The results of a 1996 survey of 255 manufacturing firms with $10-500
million in annual sales by Grant Thornton LLP, an accounting and consulting
firm that advises small manufacturers, are as follows: [WSJ 12/20/96,
9/20/96]
-
Numerous companies in this size and smaller have started to export, or
sharply increased their export efforts, in recent years.
-
Between 1994 and 1996, the percentage of small and medium sized exporters
that garner 10% of more of their revenue from exports nearly doubled to
51%.
-
Of s&ms that export, 50% said their sales to foreign customers increased
between 1994 and 1996
-
Small companies with a strong commitment to exporting, defined as those
for which exports account for at least 10% of annual sales, were more likely
to experience growth in exports.
-
76% of the companies with a strong commitment to exporting reported that
export sales increased between 1994 and 1996, which indicates that once
small companies develop confidence and skill in exporting, they are more
likely to increase foreign sales.
The results of a 1995 survey by Ernst & Young of 400 CEOs of rapidly
growing small and medium sized companies, the median sales for which were
$25 million, are as follows [WSJ 9/1/95]:
-
Overall, 56% of the companies surveyed were engaged in international activity
in 1995, up from 54% in 1994.
-
Ernst & Young’s Greg Kricksen expects that many more fast growing companies
will engage in business abroad in the future.
-
An example of a small firm engaged in international business is CoBatCo
Inc., a 21 employee waffle griddle and ice cream cone maker in Peoria,
Ill., which does business in South America, the Pacific Rim, Mexico and
Scandinavia.
-
Some 42% of respondents cited lack of understanding of language and markets
as a barrier to foreign expansion.
A survey of 919 small businesses by Arthur Andersen’s Enterprise Group,
found that companies with more than 100 employees that export are particularly
likely to hire new workers. [WSJ 8/2/95]
The results of a 1996 Coopers and Lybrand survey of 434 fast growing
small companies, including 204 with export activity [the median company
in the survey had about 70 employees and annual revenue of $7M] are as
follow [WSJ 6/19/96]:
-
Among fast growing small companies, those that export grow markedly faster
than those that don’t - and the difference is widening. The exporting
companies projected total revenue growth of 31.2% in 1996, compared with
24.9% for the non exporters.
-
Many of the companies fell into exporting as a result of being approached
by foreign companies.
-
Of the surveyed companies that planned to start exporting in 1996, more
than half were in the service sector.
While more s&ms are becomming involved internationally, the Commerce
Dept estimates that there are tens of thousands of small and medium sized
businesses that are capable of exporting but are not for the following
reasons:
-
Many small companies remain loath to export their products because they
lack the time, money and knowledge of foreign markets that exporting requires.
[WSJ 3/5/96]
-
Many small manufacturers simply avoid exporting because they cannot afford
to devote resources to developing overseas markets, or fear the unknown
of dealing with foreign agents and distributors. [WSJ 9/20/96]
-
A lack of understanding of language and markets. [WSJ 9/1/95]
Click here to return to the top of this page
To return to the IB
"Fact Sheet" click here
Click here to return to the
Gannon IB program home page
If you have comments or suggestions, email mahan@gannon.edu