This is the editing server. Do not link to this page or any page that starts with cmstest.gannon.edu.
Help us improve your website experience by completing our survey.
The overall project director since 1981 has been Gannon University professor Suzanne Richard, Ph.D. There have been 13 seasons of field excavation, research, and restoration work at the site of Khirbat Iskandar: full field excavations took place in 1982, 1984, 1987, 1997, 2000, 2004, 2010 and 2013; a pilot season of survey and soundings in 1981, a study season in 1994, restoration and preservation seasons in 1998, 2006 and 2008. We continue to restore the site each season.
The project from the beginning has been approved by the Committee on Archaeological Policy (CAP) and affiliated with the American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR). The project works closely with the American Center of Oriental Research (ACOR) in Amman, Jordan and operates under the guidance and by permit of the Department of Antiquities of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Currently, the project is sponsored by a consortium of three universities: Gannon University, Lubbock Christian University and McMurry University. Richard and Jesse C. Long, Jr., Ph.D. of Lubbock Christian University are co-directors
Earlier excavation of the site took place in 1955, when Peter Parr of the British Institute in London excavated two trenches. Prior to that, Nelson Glueck explored the site and reported on it in his monumental work, Explorations in Eastern Palestine, 1939. He was the first to recognize the importance of Khirbat Iskandar for Early Bronze Age studies, especially the EB IV period.
Khirbat Iskandar is an Arabic name and means the "ruin of Alexander (the Great)." This name is taken from a modern village nearby; the original name of the site is unknown. The name is what archaeologists would call anachronistic, since Khirbat Iskandar is an Early Bronze Age site and Alexander the Great lived and conquered the area thousands of years later (323 BCE). The Early Bronze Age (EBA) dates to ca. 3500 - 2000 BCE, a 1500-hundred-year era that saw the rise and collapse of the first cities. It is subdivided into four periods: EB I from 3500-3100; EB II from 3100-2700; EB III from 2700-2300; EB IV from 2300-2000.
The Early Bronze Age was a momentous period in the history of humankind. Why? Because it is the period of the first cities and the dawn of history: the time when writing was discovered. These great discoveries occurred in Mesopotamia and in Egypt. The "biblical lands" were greatly influenced by these advanced urban cultures to the north and south. Thus cities soon arose in Israel and Jordan as well, although evidence of writing is not found until the Middle Bronze Age, after 2000 BCE. The Early Bronze Age people were Canaanites and the land was called Canaan. You probably know the word from the Bible. The Canaanites occupied these lands before the Israelites, who are first mentioned in the Merneptah Stele, 1207 BCE.
The Early Bronze Age in the Near East is a period that can be distinguished from earlier times by a "leap" to cultural complexity. When people began to build cities, a great step occurred in human civilization. It is the very foundation of our own society today. The transition from hunter/gatherer to farmer was the first step in the development of settled life and it occurred much earlier (ca. 15,000 BCE). It was a long and gradual process, but as time went on life became more and more complex and the origin of cities was the result. There are many reasons why people would want or need to live in cities. As part of its research design, the Khirbat Iskandar project is exploring the development of cities and asking why cities suddenly disappear, as happened at the end of the EB III period in the southern Levant.
Significance of Khirbat Iskandar for the Early Bronze IV Period
Khirbat Iskandar is often called the most important site in the EB IV period. It is because it appears to be a city that continued to susrvive after all the cities disappeared at the end of EB III. One of the trademarks of a city is usually its fortifications, and in EB IV Khirbat Iskandar had fortifications. They were the rebuilt defenses of the EB I-III period, but till unique as the only EB IV fortifications excavated thus far in the southern Levant. There is also a gateway as well as a publc building; importantly, the EB IV settlement is on the tell, showing continuous occupation of the site (a rarety in the period).
In comparison with the monumental cities of EB II-III, the EB IV settlement at Khirbat Iskandar was probably more of a town or regional center. The EB IV period is generally described as a "Dark Age" or a "Nomadic Interlude." That's because until recently mostly cemeteries had been excavated and not much was known about the culture. It was a time of far less cultural complexity than was the case during during the period of the great cities of EB II-III. Earlier archaeologists thought that nomads from Syria in the north had overrun the southern Levant and destroyed all the cities at the end of EB III. Therefore, all the people then reverted to a type of nomadism called pastoral nomadism until around 2000 BCE when cities rose up once again in the Middle Bronze Age.
Thanks to greater exploration, excavation, and survey over the past 20 years, our views on the EB IV have changed quite a bit. There probably was no invasion. Today archaeologists prefer to look not outside but within the culture itself to find the reasons for cultural change. All the people in the EB IV were not nomadic. Excavation demonstrates that there are, in fact, many sites known where people were permanently settled and lived primarily as farmers. These people traded agricultural produce with the pastoral nomads in exchange for meat and dairy products. This symbiotic relationship between nomads and settled people has always existed in the Near East. What is new is the knowledge that things didn't change even during a "Dark Age
Location and Description
Look at the accompanying map to find Khirbat Iskandar. As you can see, it is east of the Dead Sea and south of Madaba, a major town about 20 miles south of the capital city of Amman, Jordan. It takes about an hour to drive from Amman to Khirbat Iskandar. The site sits on the north bank of the Wadi el Wala, at an important crossing point of a famous caravan route called the "King's Highway." The ancient inhabitants probably chose its location also because the wadi was a perennial river and an important source of water at that time.
Defense is always a consideration and so the city was built on a hill, which is why it is called Khirbat Iskandar and not Tell Iskander. Over 1500 years, the mound rose to a height of 20 meters (65 feet) as successive cities were built, destroyed and rebuilt. The mound gradually began to look more like a tell, as occupation built up over time. This buildup occurred because, unlike today, there were no bulldozers to clear the destroyed city before a new one was built. At an overall size of about 8 acres, Khirbat Iskandar is generally in the range of a medium-sized site.
We believe that in antiquity, a larger area was inhabited in the environs of the site, for a menhir stood across the wadi to the south, material remains were found by Glueck to the north and east of the site, and there are 3 cemeteries in the vicinity of the site
a) The Area C Gateway
Our work in Area C has been completed and is now published in Vol. 1 of the Khirbat Iskandar Expedition(see link to publication page). The major discovery in this area at the southeast corner of the mound was a gate, the only EB IV gate known in the southern Levant. Area C included three subphases.We are mainly concerned with the latest phase, but it is important to note that Phase 1 was residential and displayed evidences of being a transitional EBIII/EB IV phase, extremely important for the enigmatic change from urban to non-urban settlement throughout the southern Levant. In the latest phase, there is a single-entrygateway. In the isometric drawing, you can see steps at the lower and at the upper end of the plastered passageway. The passageway is lined with stone benches. It seems that people entered the gate in order to walk to the upper part of the mound. We don’t really know what activities went on in this gateway, but literary references are suggestive. The Bible mentions that “justice took place in the gate." Other ancient Near Eastern texts refer to trade and other types of activities.
On either side of the entryway are large structures that perhaps were"guardrooms," one of which was paved. The remains found to the north of the upper steps indicate that the area was a courtyard. Off to the left of the courtyard, there is a small room, which appeared to be a storage area and perhas cooking area, for there were storage jars sitting on the pavement at one end. To the right of the gateway were work areas. We drew this conclusion based on features such as work tables and the large stone table and “chairs” that were found in association with a great amount of flint debitage, along with ground stone objects for pounding and shaping flintcores into actual knives, and other types of tools.
The photo of the flintknives shows a perfect example of what is known as a "Canaanean blade." It is worked on both sides. A number ofthese blades were placed inside a scythe or sickle tool, which was used to cutgrain. Archaeologists know this because the blades usually have a patina or glossiness from contactwith grains. To the north of the entryway, there was a courtyard; off to theleft there was a small room, which appeared to be a work and storage area,based on the storage jars sitting on the pavement at one end.
b) Early Bronze IV: the Phase B, Area A Settlement
A very different kind of neighborhood came to light in the latest phase (A) in Area B. There we found a lot of evidence for the everyday life of people who must have walked through the gate in order to reach their homes at the northwest corner. Most of the buildings were strung together, that is they shared one or two walls with neighboring houses. Looking at the plan, we can see that the buildings could be "long-room" or "broad-room" houses. The structure in B1 is long, since as you enter, you see the length of the room; whereas, the doorway in B10 is on the long wall so that when you enter, the room appears to be broad, not long. Note that unlike B1, many of the buildings are subdivided into several rooms.
We may assume that, as in our very own homes, they had kitchens, sleeping rooms, work areas. Because the archaeologist saves everything during the excavation, it is possible to study the associations of materials and discover activity areas. For example, there was cooking activity found in B1, B2, B7, and B19 since excavation uncovered a tabun in each of those areas. The best associations of materials were found in B19. Near the tabun was a mortar used for grinding grain to make flour probably, and a large flat slab nearby probably served as a preparation surface for making the bread. Also in this room was a small bin, where vessels containing food and liquids were probably stored. We are calling this activity area a kitchen. Additional excavation of this house revealed a building with multiple rooms, including an apparent domestic cultic room, as suggested by the two pillars.
Further evidence for activities appeared in B11. This house, apparently, was used for a different type of work than the preparation of food. Here we found a table with small depression next to a mortar set into the ground, as well as a large stone slab or table. These seem to be grinding installations. In the room a great deal of red powdery material was found in the surface, indicating that perhaps hematite or another material was being ground up and used as a coloring agent.
Note also that this house and the house next door both had a row of pillars. Since pillars were not found in other houses, it is clear that they signify a different activity, perhaps status or wealth of the owner. It may reflect a type of courtyard house, where one half of the building was covered and the other open. In later periods, we know that small farm animals like sheep and goat might be stabled under the roofed section, while domestic activities took place in the courtyard and the people lived in another room or on a second floor.
A few other different types of activities are indicated, for example, in B2 there is a series of small bins dividing the space; it is difficult to know if they are for small animals or for work areas. There is a large courtyard in B5.
Over all, in Phase A we have what appeared to have been a typical Early Bronze Age permanently settled community of people who were farmers, but who also owned flocks. It seems that the community was fairly self-sufficient, since evidence for various types of manufacturing processes was discovered. Although a potter's kiln has not yet been found, studies of the clays used in making the Khirbat Iskandar pottery suggest that the pottery was made locally.
In short, in a period when there is less complexity and fewer interrelations among sites, the people of a community have to do everything in order to survive. In the EB II-III, on the other hand, certain towns and cities would provide specialized objects for trade, the smaller farming communities would produce the grain for the cities, and pastoral-nomads would tend large flocks in order to trade meat and dairy products with the cities. The Phase A community at Khirbat Iskandar reflects the end of a 1500 year long civilization and a dying tradition. In 2000 BCE, it ends and the new vibrant Middle Bronze Age era begins.
Digging into earlier layers of the EB IV period has shown us that prior to Phase A, the community was more sophisticated, more complex, and more diverse. How do we know this? Well, this settlement was enclosed by a strong defensive wall. In Area B, rather than a series of domestic structures oriented north-south, we found a large public complex, that is, a number of rooms that all seemed to be part of one structure. The rooms run up to the fortifications, so it's much different from the last settlement (Phase A) above.
There is a large central room that has pillar bases. There would have been wooden beams set on them holding up the roof. We know this because we found the remains of the beams. In the corner was an exceptionally well-made stone slab-lined basin. It contained many layers of seeds, grains, olives, and other remains. Through a doorway, one entered the bench-lined room next door to the left. There were many vessels in both the central room and the bench room, some found upside down in destruction debris. Remains of foods were found in some of the storejars. An entrance with steps was found in the main room. There was a pivot stone which indicates there was a doorway. The steps led south into a corridor and presumably into other rooms of the building. Further excavation has now clarified the area to the south somewhat. We now know that there were a series of rooms and courtyard associated with the storeroom. We are in the process of linking up the rooms to the west also that we will have an overview of the entire Phase B settlement. Off to the west, a second complex has appeared, including another wellmade stone slab bin, elongated in shape, near which two votive cups were found.
This structure is extremely important because most of the vessels on display at the Erie Art Museum were found in it. It is unlikely that a family would have over a hundred vessels in their house. This is why we think that this is a public building of some sort. It may have been a storeroom for the entire town. It may indicate that there were leaders or elites of the community who controlled the food and distributed it to the people.
It is also possible that there was a religious or cultic function or purpose to this structure, since many unusual things were found. For example, numerous miniature vessels were found near the stone basin. Often miniatures are used for libation purposes, that is the pouring of sacred liquids. Also, one area included a stone-lined pit in which we found a beautiful bowl that had in it the hoof of a bovine, perhaps the remnant of an offering. Nearlyby were goathorns, often an indicator of the cult. In a context with the stone-lined bin, in which there were many levels of foodstuffs delineated (perhaps offerings), it is reasonable to infer some type of cultic activity.
Thus, as we prepare Area B for publication in Vol. 2, our working hypothesis is that the public complex and dits numerous unique features is not a domesstic structure but rather provides striking evidence for elites living and ruling at the site, and whose storerooms indicate either a cultic area, a redistribution center, or surpluses of food, liquids, oils used for trade.
This complex reflects a type of activity different from the later Phase A domestic houses found above. In Phase B we have not found tabuns for example, or much evidence for a variety of occupations and work in this area. The conclusion is that the population was more specialized and included different ocupational areas across the mound.
All of this seems to show that, at the beginning the EB IV, inhabitants continued the ways of the urban EB III peoples. Only toward the end, Phase A, did they drift into more of a village-type economy.
Earlier urban Settlements at the Site--Phases C, D, E
There may have been a transitional phase between the EB III and the EB IV Phase B settlements, although we are not yet certain. The destruction layer covering the Phase C (EB III) settlement was significant, followed by the rebuilding activities of the EB IV occupants. The major stratum below (Phase C) is a settlement for which there is evidence of two phases. We know the most about the settlement that was destroyed, thanks to the aterials found in place below a thick level of destruction. What is clear is that the original Phase C people buit very different structures that comprised a stone base and mudbrick superstructure. Some of the walls are still standing to 6' high. The photo gives a view of a central room with pillar base; the room is built right up against the fortifications. It is in this room where much of the pottery, many storejars filled with lentils, was found within destruction debris of roofing stone, mudbrick, beams and ash. At the west end, there is a well-preserved wall with doorway and stone threshhold. Its surface led to steps that a person could use to climb to the top f the tower to guard for enemies approaching the site.
To the south of this large room, there was a courtyard, attested by a well-made stone bone and a mortar. Interestingly, two post holes were found as well. Anothehr room was found west of the courtyard in which a host of unusually well-made stone bowls were found, along with a potter's wheel, a macehead, and much restorable pottery as seen by the "teapot" shown in the photo. We continue to expose more of the Phase C settlement, as well as earlier occupation along the western perimeter of the site.
The fortifications at Khirbat Iskandar comprise two major wall lines, a square tower, a platform, and transverse walls. As we now understand, the Phase C fortifications, tower, and platform were a secondary reinforcement of an earlier (Phase D) inner mudbrick wall with towers that suffered a major destructionas well. Although this was our hypothesis early on, the recent discovery of a curved mudbrick wall running under the tower dispels the questions we originally had concerning the relationship of the mudbrick to the outer stone defenses. The combined fortifications in Phase C then range as thick as 8’ near the highly fortified northwest corner. More recent excavations have revealed that two curved mudbrick structures on stone socles, presumably towers, are juxtaposed on either side of a stone threshold, looking very much like an entrance. Other well-built mudbrick walls on stone socles have come to light in Phase D. Our goal in future excavations is toconnect the mudbrick structures with interior occupation so as to clarify whether they date to EB II or EB I.
As mentioned above, there are numerous cemeteries in the vicinity of Khirbat Iskandar. To the east is cemetery E, to the west is Cemetery J, and across the wadi to the south is cemetery D. Mostly the project has excavated EB IV shaft tombs. In the EB IV period, people did not bury their dead in huge caves as the urban people did, probably indicative of family burials.
In the chamber of the shaft tomb E6, we found evidence for multiple burials along with pottery and objects. Tomb E3, however, was small and only had a pile of bonesaround which were four vessels. We have not found any burial evidence for theEB II-III period, although there are a number of robbed caves that we investigated in the hillside across the wadi to the south.
In Cemetery J to the west,one EB I tomb was found. It was very different from either of the two types of burial customs mentioned. This was a cist tomb that was dug into the ground and then covered with stones. In it were many bone fragments and typical EB I pottery like the duck-bill storejar, well as small cup with high handle, which was used as adipper juglet for dipping out water.